Fenlo vs GoSearch: how the two platforms compare
Of the platforms built to compete with the large enterprise search incumbents, GoSearch is the closest to Fenlo in spirit: both publish self-serve pricing, both offer a free tier, and both are building no-code AI agents rather than gating agent-building behind an enterprise contract. The differences show up in how far that transparency extends, and in how agent actions are approved and shared.
This comparison reflects publicly available information as of August 2026. Pricing and packaging change on both sides, so confirm current terms directly before deciding.
At a glance
| Fenlo | GoSearch | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Published for every tier, including Enterprise | Published for Free and Pro; Enterprise is a custom quote |
| Free tier | Yes, bring your own model keys | Yes, for personal use |
| Entry paid tier | $21/seat/month (Pro), $33/seat/month (Enterprise) | $20/user/month (Pro) |
| Connectors | 50+, unlimited on paid plans | 100+ across indexed, federated, and MCP connectors |
| Search | Hybrid keyword + vector, permission-aware | Hybrid indexed + federated search, multimodal (GPT-4 Vision) |
| Agents | Configurable behavior, multi-step actions with human approval gates, shareable with a person/group/workspace | No-code agent and workflow builder |
| Enterprise controls | SSO/SAML/OIDC, RBAC, SCIM, audit logs — priced and published | SSO/SAML/SCIM, BYOC, BYO LLM key — behind a sales conversation |
| Compliance | GDPR & CCPA compliant, SOC 2 Type II in progress | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, HIPAA compliant (self-reported) |
Where pricing stays transparent
GoSearch deserves credit for publishing its Free and Pro pricing when most of the category doesn't. That transparency stops at the Enterprise tier: SSO, SCIM, BYOC, and API access all sit behind a "contact sales" page, which is exactly where the pricing conversation gets opaque again for the plan most security-conscious teams actually need.
Fenlo publishes all three tiers, including the $33/seat/month Enterprise plan with SSO, RBAC, SCIM, and audit logs. You can see the real cost of the plan with the controls IT will ask for before you talk to anyone.
Agents: no-code building vs. approval-gated actions
Both platforms let non-engineers build agents without writing code. GoSearch's agents and workflows are built around its hybrid indexed/federated architecture and multimodal search — useful if screenshots, images, or URLs are part of what people search for.
Fenlo's agents are configured with custom instructions and a restricted knowledge base, and specifically pause for human approval before executing anything that changes a system of record — updating a ticket, drafting a document, sending a message. Agents can then be shared with a person, a group, or the whole workspace, with usage analytics and version history attached, rather than living as a personal, unshared workflow.
Which one fits
Pick GoSearch if multimodal search — images, screenshots, visual queries — is a real part of how your team looks for information, and you're comfortable with Enterprise pricing reverting to a sales call.
Pick Fenlo if you want every plan, including the one with SSO and SCIM, to have a public price, and you need agents that gate sensitive actions behind explicit human approval before anything executes.
Read more about what Fenlo is or talk to sales about migrating from another platform.